Gökmen, S., Aykin, Y., Basik, A., & Alacam, S. (2023). A Recursive Algorithm for the Generative Study of Seljuk Muqarnas in Kayseri and Sivas. Nexus Network Journal, 25(3), 751-772.

Source

Tong, H., Türel, A., Şenkal, H., Ergun, S., Güzelci, O. Z., & Alaçam, S. (2023). Can AI Function as a New Mode of Sketching: A Teaching Experiment with Freshman. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(18).

Source

Hamzaoglu, B., & Özkar, M. (2023). Rule-based Milling of Medieval Stone Patterns. Nexus Network Journal, 25(4), 945-960.

Source

Rezoug, A., & Özkar, M. (2023). A Lived-in Shape Grammar: Parsing the Dwelling Activities in a Modernist Residential Building in Algiers. Design and Culture, 1-28.

Source

Taşdelen, H. S., & Gül, L. F. (2023). The Digital Habitus of Architecture: Praxis of Design-oriented Internet Usage. Journal of Computational Design, 4(1), 71-98.

Source

Tümerdem, D., & Gül, L. F. (2023). Temporalities of a DIY biocomposite through material exploration. The Design Journal, 26(6), 900-918.

Source

Yıldız, B., Çağdaş, G. & Zincir, İ. (2023). Architectural space classification considering topological and 3D visual spatial relations using machine learning techniques. Building Researh & Information.

Source

Çavuş, Ö., Cenani, Ş. & Çağdaş, G. (2023). An experience-based method for personalized routing. Journal of Computational Design, 4(1), 167-191.

Source

Özkar, Mine & Altun, Sevgi. (2023). Loxodromes in Herringbone Patterns of Two Masonry Domes. Nexus Network Journal. 10.1007/s00004-023-00665-9.

Source

Sipahioğlu, N. & Çağdaş, G. (2023). Scenario-Based Cellular Automata and Artificial Neural Networks in Urban Growth Modeling. Gazi University Journal of Science, 36(1), 20-37.

Source

Koçer Özgün, F.N. & Alaçam, S. (2022). An Evaluation of Augmented Reality-Based User Interfaces in the Design Process. ASCAAD 2022 – Architecture in the Age of the Metaverse – Opportunities and Potentials, Architecture and Planning Journal, 28(3),pp: 548-561.

Source

Alani, M. & Alaçam, S. (2022). Beyond Flat Surfaces: Parametric Derivations of Historical Islamic Geometric Designs. ASCAAD 2022 – Architecture in the Age of the Metaverse – Opportunities and Potentials, Architecture and Planning Journal, 28(3),pp: 451-462.

Source

Alaçam, S., Karadağ, İ., Güzelci, O.Z. (2022). Reciprocal style and information transfer between historical Istanbul Pervititch Maps and satellite views using machine learning. ESTOA-REVISTA De La Facultad De Arquıtectura Y Urbanismo De La Universidad De Cuenca, 11(22), 11.

Source

Karadag, I., Güzelci, O. Z., & Alaçam, S. (2022). EDU-AI: a twofold machine learning model to support classroom layout generation. Construction Innovation.

Source

Gökmen, S., Başık, A., Aykın, Y. & Alaçam, S. (2022). Computational Modeling and Analysis of Seljukid Muqarnas in Kayseri. ACM Journal On Computing and Cultural Heritage, 15(2), 1-19.

Source

Serdar Yakut, E.S., Cenani, Ş. & Çağdaş, G. (2022). Assessment of urban surface performance of open spaces with multi-criteria decision making method. Megaron, 17(4), 658–672.

Source

Buyruk, Y. & Çağdaş, G. (2022). Interactive Parametric Design and Robotik Fabrication within Mixed Reality Environment. Applied Sciences, 12(24), 1-17.

Source

Öksüz Uncu, E. & Çağdaş, G. (2022). The Pedagojical Alignment of Computational Thinking to Architecture Education for the 21st Century Learners. Journal of Computational Design, 3(2), 159-172.

Source

Buyruk, Y., Cenani, Ş., & Çağdaş, G. (2022). An Agent-based Home Exchange Model to Reduce Commute Times of University Students. International Journal of Digital Innovation in the Built Environment (IJDIBE), 11(2), 1-16.

Source

Kaynarkaya, S. & Çağdaş, G. (2022). Evaluation of Metro Lines with Swarm Intelligence Approach. ITcon: Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 27, 802-826

Source

Çalışır Adem, P. & Çağdaş, G. (2022). Cellular Automata for Infıll Designs in Historic Urban Quarters. Nexus Network Journal, 24(3), 567-586.

Source

Kırdar, G. & Çağdaş, G. (2022). A Decision Support Model to Evaluate Liveability in the Context of Urban Vibrancy. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 20(3), 528-552.

Source

Coşkun, E. & Çağdaş, G. (2022). Temel Tasarım Stüdyosu: Bilgisayar Oyunu Tabanlı Yaklaşımı Anlamak ve Tasarlamak. Journal of Computational Design, 3(2), 59-86.

Source

Durmazoğlu, M. Ç., & Gül, L. F. (2022). Exploring usability tests to evaluate designers’ interaction with mobile augmented reality application for conceptual architectural design. A| Z ITU JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE, 19(1), 225-242.

Source

Akdoğan, M., & Balaban, Ö. (2022). Plan Generation with Generative Adversarial Networks: Haeckel’s Drawings to Palladian Plans. Journal of Computational Design, 3(1), 135-154.

Source

Güzelci, O. Z., Bayram, A. K. Ş., Alaçam, S., Güzelci, H., Akkuyu, E. I., & Şencan, İ. (2021). Design tactics for enhancing the adaptability of primary and middle schools to the new needs of postpandemic reuse. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 15(1), 148-166.

Source

Akçay Kavakoğlu, A., Güleç Özer, D., Domingo-Callabuig, D. & Bilen, Ö.(2021). Architectural design communication (ADC) in online education during COVID-19 pandemic: a comparison of Turkish and Spanish universities. Open House International, 47(2), 361-384.

Source

Yıldız, B. & Çağdaş, G. (2021). Bulanık Mantık ile Kullanıcı Hareketlerinde Etmen Tabanlı Modelleme. JCoDe: Journal of Computational Design/Hesaplamalı Tasarım Dergisi, İTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi E-Dergisi, 2(1), 243-264.

Source

Alkılınç, E, Cenani, Ş.,& Çağdaş, G. (2021). Bisiklet Paylaşım İstasyonlarının Belirlenmesi: CBS Tabanlı Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yaklaşımı / Determination of bicycle sharing stations: GIS-based multi-criteria decision making approach. Journal of Balıkesir University Institute of Science and Technology, 23(2), 471-489.

Source

Karakoç, E. & Çağdaş, G. (2021). A Data-Driven Conceptual Framework for Climate Adaptive Building Shell: A Hybrid Control Strategy.Civil Engineering and Architecture, 9(2), 427-438.

Source

Karakoç, E. & Çağdaş, G. (2021). Adaptive Architecture Based on Environmental Performance: An Advanced Intelligent Façade (AIF) Module. Gazi University Journal of Science, 34(3), 630-650.

Source

Moralıoğlu, B., Cenani, Ş.,& Çağdaş, G. (2021). A Decision Support System for Placing Shared E-Scooters: A Case Study for İstanbul. Journal of Computational Design, 2(2), 127-148.

Source

Dinçer, A.E & Çağdaş, G. (2021). A Spatial Grammar Model for Designing Mass Customized High-rise Housing Blocks. Journal of Computational Design, 2(2), 51-72.

Source

Aksoy, E. S., Cenani, Ş., & Çağdaş, G. (2021). Kamusal Alanlar Arasındaki Mikromobiliteyi Destekleyecek Kişiselleştirilmiş Ulaşım Modeli Önerisi. İDEALKENT, 12(33), 1006-1037.

Source

Yazıcı, S. (2021). The Performance-based Interlinked Model (PBIM) in Architectural Design: Exchanging Environmental, Structural and Spatial Parameters in the Early Design Stage. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 38(1), 23-52.

Source

Sevinç, E., & Alaçam, S. (2021). Mimari nesneyi değerlendirmek için mereolojik bir çerçeve. Journal of Computational Design, 2(1), 1-26. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jcode/issue/60846/863148

Source

Çavuş, Ö. (2021). Phenomenological evaluation on wayfinding in complex educational buildings: The case of ITU Faculty of Architecture. Journal of Computational Design, 2(1), 285-312. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jcode/issue/60846/862422

Source

Çalışır Adem, P. & Çağdaş, G. (2020). Computational Design Thinking through Cellular Automata: Reflections from Design Studios. Journal of Design Studio, 2(2), 71-83.

Source

Bayraktar, M.E. & Çağdaş, G. (2020). A Mobile Design Environment for Building Form Generation. Journal of Design Studio, 2(2), 131-142.

Source

Guzelci, O. Z., Alacam, S., Kocabay, S., Akkuyu, E. I., (2020), Adaptability of Primary and Middle Schools to Post-Pandemic Reuse – A Discussion in the Context of Flexibility, Journal of Design Studio, V.2, N.2, pp 5-22.

Source

Güzelci, O. Z., Bayram, A. K. Ş., Alaçam, S., Güzelci, H., Akkuyu, E. I., & Şencan, İ. (2020). Design tactics for enhancing the adaptability of primary and middle schools to the new needs of postpandemic reuse. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-10-2020-0237

Source

Kay, İ. Özkar, M. (2020). “Designing for spatial narration in children’s playscapes.” ITU J Faculty Arch., 17(3): 155-167. https://doi.org/10.5505/itujfa.2020.25932

Source

Hysa, T., Özkar, M. (2020). “Open Design Education: Addressing Accountability in the Age of Computing.” Megaron, 15(3): 343-349. https://doi.org/10.14744/megaron.2020.32650

Source

Tolunay Berber, C., Özkar, M. (2020). “A Computable Vitality: Tange’s Architectural System for Skopje” METU Journal of Faculty of Architecture. 37(2): 85-102. https://doi.org/10.4305/METU.JFA.2020.2.4

Source

Altun S., Güneş M. C. (2020). Classification of Historic Ornaments with CNN. JCoDe: Journal of Computational Design, 1(3), 115-130.

Source

Kaynarkaya, S. & Çağdaş, G. (2020). Sürü Zekası Yaklaşımı ile Metro Hatlarının Değerlendirilmesi. JCoDe: Journal of Computational Design, 1(3), 17- 48.

Source

Yazıcı, S. (2020). Doğal Sistemlerle Bilgilendirilmiş Hesaplamalı Tasarım. JCoDe: Journal of Computational Design, 1(3), 1-17.

Source

Güzelci, O. Z., Alaçam, S., Şen Bayram, A.K. & Lacroix, I. (2020). Measuring the Entropy of Sinan. Nexus Network Journal

Source

Öksüz, E. & Çağdaş, G. (2020). The Convergence Of Computational Thinking And Its Cognitive Aspects In Architectural Education. IJARR: International Journal of Advanced Research and Review, 5 (3), 29-39.

Source

Öksüz, E.B. & Çağdaş, G. (2020). An Assesment Method for a Designerly way of Computational Thinking. A|Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, İstanbul/Türki̇ye, 17(2), 199-208.

Source

Rezoug, A. & Özkar, M. (2020) Visual Rules for Socio-Spatial Analysis: Inferring a Grammar of Use in an Inhabited Climat de France. Dearq, 27, 62-75. https:// doi.org/10.18389/dearq27.2020.05

Source

Yazıcı, S & Tanacan, L. (2020). Material-based computational design (MCD) in sustainable architecture. Journal of Building Engineering, 32.

Source

Ünal, F. C. & Demir, Y. (2020). Local Data: A New Approach to Data in Architecture. A|Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 17(1), 13-23.

Source

Uzun, C., Çolakoğlu, M. B. & İnceoğlu, A. (2020). GAN as a generative architectural plan layout tool: A case study for training DCGAN with Palladian Plans, and evaluation of DCGAN outputs. A|Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, İstanbul/Türki̇ye.

Source

Gül, L. F. (2020). Dijital Teknolojilerin İşbirlikli Tasarıma Olan Etkisi. Megaron. 2020; 15(1): 84-98.

Source

Yıldız, B. & Çağdaş, G. (2020). Fuzzy logic in agent-based modeling of user movement in urban space: Definition and application to a case study of a square. Building and Environment, 169.

Source

Maden, S. (2019). Generating Rhythmic Graphic Patterns and Paul Klee’s Concept of Active Line. Leonardo, 53, 1-9. The MIT Press.

Source

Llach, D. C. & Ozkar, M. (2019) Cultivating the critical imagination: post-disciplinary pedagogy in a computational design laboratory, Digital Creativity, 30:4, 257-276.

Source

Elmas, S. & Alaçam, S. (2019). Beton Kabuk Strüktür Tasarımı Bağlamında Hesaplama ve Örme. JCoDe: Journal of Computational Design/ Hesaplamalı Tasarım Dergisi, 1(1), 55- 64.

Source

Elbasdi, G., Alaçam, S. (2019). Miselyumun Yetiştirilmiş ve Esnek bir Malzeme Olarak Kullanımı Üzerine bir Araştırma, JCoDe Journal of Computational Design/ Hesaplamalı Tasarım Dergisi, 1(1), 01-10). ISSN 2687-4318.

Source

Güner, Y. R., Çağdaş, G., (2019). Üç Yönlü Periyodik Minimal Yüzeyler ile Biçim Arama Yaklaşımı, JCoDe: Journal of Computational Design/Hesaplamalı Tasarım Dergisi, İTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi E-Dergisi, 2019/1, 35-54.

Source

Çavuşoğlu, Ö., Çağdaş, G.(2019) Evaluation of Decision Making Processes in the Early Design Stage with Building Information Modeling in the Context of Sustainability, JCoDe: Journal of Computational Design, 1, sf: 35-54.

Source

Kirkan, S., Çağdaş, G. (2019) Dans Hareketleri Verilerinin Sayısal Ortamda Forma Dönüştürülmesi. Journal Of Computational Design, 1(1), 11-34.

Source

Şabanoğlu Gamsız, Ö., Çağdaş, G., (2019) Analysis and Evaluation of the Wind Effect on User Comfort in Mass Housing Open Areas, Megaron, Cilt 14, Özel sayı, 53-69, (doi: 10.5505/megaron.2018.91668).

Source

Kırdar, G., Cenani, Ş., Çağdaş, G., (2019). Smart Bicycle-Sharing System Design for the Historical Peninsula of Istanbul, Journal of Urban Studies: Kent Araştırmaları Dergisi: idealkent, vol. 10, issue: 27, (ISSN: 1307-9905 E-ISSN: 2602-2133) (doi:10.31198/idealkent.507208).

Source

Varinlioğlu, G., Turhan, G. D., & Alaçam, S. (2019) Dijital Fabrikasyon Aracı Olarak Pavyon Tasarımı. Yapı, 446, 36-41.

Source

Güzelci, O. Z., & Alaçam, S. (2019). A Study on Measuring Complexity in Muqarnas Patterns. The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, 9(2), 191-201.

Source

Karaoğlan, F. C., & Alaçam, S. (2019). Design of a post-disaster shelter through soft computing. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 17(2), 185-205.

Source

Alaçam, S., Çakıcı Alp, N., Cesur, D. (2018). Algoritmik Sıçramalar: Gölcük Seramik Müzesindeki İç Mekan Sergileme Elemanları Tasarımı ve Üretimi (Algorithmic Leaps: Design and Fabrication of Gölcük Ceramic Museum Interior Exhibition Elements), Yapı, Mimarlık, Tasarım, Kültür ve Sanat Dergisi, 437, 74-81.

Source

Çavuşoğlu Ö. H., Çağdaş, G. (2018) Enhancing Decision Making Processes In Early Design Stages: Opportunities Of Bim To Achieve Energy Efficient Design Solutions A-z Itu Journal Of The Faculty Of Architecture, 15(1), 53-64.

Source

Gürbüz Yildirim, E., Çağdaş, G. (2018) Space Syntax Analysis Of Traditional Arcitectural Pattern Of In The Context Of Socio-culture. Gaziantep University Journal Of Social Sciences, 17(2), 508-532.

Source

Coskun, E., Çağdaş, G. (2018) Considering Computer Games As A Learning Tool In Basic Design Education. International Journal Of Advanced Research, 6(7), 1077-1095.

Source

Çalişir Adem, P., Çağdaş, G. (2018) Interpretation Of Urban Data In The Complex Pattern Of Traditional City: The Case Of Amasya. A-z Itu Journal Of The Faculty Of Architecture, 15(1). 23-38.

Source

Elmas, S., & Alaçam, S. Beton Kabuk Strüktür Tasarımı Bağlamında Hesaplama ve Örme. Journal of Computational Design, 1(1), 55-64.

Source

Kaya, E., Alacam, S., Findik, Y., & Balcisoy, S. (2018). Low-fidelity prototyping with simple collaborative tabletop computer-aided design systems. Computers & Graphics, 70, 307-315.

Source

Ensari, E., & Özkar, M. (2018). Shape computations with NURB curves. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 32(3), 282-294.

Source

Gül, L. F. (2018). Studying gesture-based interaction on a mobile augmented reality application for co-design activity. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 12(2), 109-124.

Source

Yildirim, Ş., & Alaçam, S. (2018). Investigation on Algorithm Aided BIM Standards To Increase Collaboration and Optimisation in Project Phase: A Case Study. A|Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture. 15 (1). 66-75. https://dx.doi.org/10.5505/itujfa.2018.44711

Source

Bittermann, M. S. (2018). Insight into color aesthetics from probabilistic perception modeling. Color Research & Application, 43(4), 527-543.

Source

Atak Doğan, Ö., Çağdaş, G. (2017) Understanding Complex Urban Systems With Fractals: Germir. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2(43), 25-44.

Source

Alaçam, S., Güzelci, O. Z., Gürer, E. & Bacınoğlu, S. Z. (2017). Reconnoitring computational potentials of the vault-like forms: Thinking aloud on muqarnas tectonics. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 15(4), 285-303.

Source

Guzelci, O. Z., Alaçam, S., & Bacınoğlu, S. Z. (2017). Three-Step Experimentation on Embedding Curvature to Rigid Planar Materials Through Cut Patterns. Gestão & Tecnologia de Projetos, 12(3), 93-107.

Source

Özgan, S.Y., Özkar, M. (2017). A Thirteenth-Century Dodecahedron in Central Anatolia: Geometric Patterns and Polyhedral Geometry. Nexus Network Journal 19, 455–471.

Source

Badem Aksoy, Y., Çağdaş, G., Balaban, Ö. (2016) A Pareto Based Genetic Algorithm Model For Sustainable Site Layout Design Of Social Housing Sspm. Megaron / Yıldız Technical University, Faculty Of Architecture E Journal, Istanbul/Türki̇ye, 11(2), 241-253.

Source

Özbaki̇, Ç., Çağdaş, G., Yağmur Ki̇li̇mci̇, E. S. (2016) Comparing Design Productivity Analog And Digital. Megaron / Yıldız Technical University Faculty Of Architecture E Journal, İstanbul/Türki̇ye, 11(3), 398-411.

Source

Gürer, E. (2016). A Computational Approach to Generate New Modes of Spatiality. A| Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 13(2), 133-142.

Source

Alaçam, S. & Çağdaş, G. (2016). Spatial dimensions of bodily experience in architectural modeling: A case study. A| Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 13(3), 1-12.

Source

Varinlioğlu, G., Alaçam, S., Başarır, L., Genca, Ö. & Üçok, I. (2016). Bilgisayar destekli teknik çizimde yeni yaklaşımlar: temsil araçları arası dönüsüm. Yapı, 419, 137-141.

Özener O. Ö.,Temiz G. (2016). Mimarlık ve İnşaat Sektöründe YBM Odaklı Dönüşüm. Ege Mimarlık, 26(93-/2016/2), 34-37.

Çağdaş, G., Bacınoğlu, Z., Çavuşoğlu, Ö., (2015). Mimarlıkta Hesaplamalı Yaklaşımlar, Mimarlık Dosya 35, TMMOB Mimarlar Odası Ankara Şubesi Dergisi, 33-42.

Source

Çağdaş, G., Bacinoğlu, S. Z., Çavuşoğlu, Ö.H. (2015) Mimarlıkta Hesaplamalı Yaklaşımlar. Mimarlık Dosya, Ankara/Türki̇ye, No. 35, 33-42.

Source

Çağdaş, G. (2015) İtü’de Hesaplamalı Mimari Tasarım Lisansüstü Eğitimi. Mimaran, Konya/Türki̇ye, No. 11, 59-64.

Atak Doğan, Ö., Çağdaş, G. (2015) The Reflection Of Religious Diversity And Socio Cultural Meaning On The Spatial Configuration Of Traditional Kayseri Houses. Itu A-z, İstanbul/Türki̇ye, 12(3), 249-265.

Source

Gürer, E., & Alaçam, S., (2015). Sayısal Düşünmenin Yaratıcılık Bağlamında Sökümü. Mimarlıkta ‘Sayısal Fırsatlar, Bilgisayar Mimarlığın Neresinde?, TMMOB Mimarlar Odası Ankara Şubesi , 58-63.

Source

Gürer, E., Özkar, M., & Çağdaş, G. (2015). A Hermeneutical Sketch Of Design Computation. Metu Journal Of The Faculty Of Architecture, 32(01), 165-183.

Source

Gürsoy, B., & Özkar, M. (2015). Visualizing making: Shapes, materials, and actions. Design Studies, 41, 29-50.

Source

Gürsoy, B., Özkar, M. (2015). Schematizing Basic Design in Ilhan Koman’s “Embryonic” Approach. Nexus Network Journal 17, 981–1005.

Source

Gürer, E., Özkar Kabakçioğlu, M., Çağdaş, G. (2014) The Role of Interpretation in Basic Design. ITU A-Z, İstanbul/TÜRKİYE, 11(1), 158-173.

Source

Alaçam, S., Çağdaş, G. (2014) Bodily and Spatial Dimensions of Architectural Design Process in the Digital Age within Embodiment of Experience, MEGARON / Yıldız Technical University, Faculty of Architecture E-Journal, istanbul/TÜRKİYE, 9(4), 312-320.

Source

Di̇nçer, A. E., Çağdaş, G., Tong, H. (2014) A Generative Computer Model For The Preliminary Design Of Mass Housing. Megaron / Yıldız Technical University, Faculty Of Architecture E-journal, İstanbul/Türki̇ye, Vol. 9, No. 2, 71-84.

Source

Di̇nçer, A. E., Tong, H., Çağdaş, G. (2014) A Computational Model for Mass Customized Housing Design by using Cellular Automata. ITU A-Z, İstanbul/TÜRKİYE, 11(2), 351-368.

Source

Dinçer, A. E.,Tong, H., Çağdaş, G. (2014). A computational model for mass customized housing design bu using cellular automata. A| Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 11(2): 351-368.

Source

Gürer, E., Özkar, M., & Çağdaş, G. (2014). The role ofinterpretation in basic design. A| Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 11(1), 158-173.

Source

Alaçam, S., & Çağdaş, G. (2014). Deneyimin Somutlaşması Yaklaşımı Bağlamında Sayısal Çağda Mimari Tasarım Sürecinde Beden ve Uzam. MEGARON/Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Mimarlık Fakültesi E-Dergisi, 9(4), 312-320.

Source

Güner, Y. R., Çağdaş, G., (2019) Üç Yönlü Periyodik Minimal Yüzeyler ile Biçim Arama Yaklaşımı, JCoDe: Journal of Computational Design/Hesaplamalı Tasarım Dergisi, İTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi E-Dergisi, 35-54.

Source

Aksoy, M., Bilgen, S., & Baslo, M. (2013). Thoughts and Ideas on Ecological Sustainability and The Reflections on Architecture. International Journal for Housing Science & Its Applications, 37(3).

Source

Torus, B. & Şener, S. M. (2013). FPL_Gen: A Computational Tool for Generating Flexible Plan Layouts, Intercultural Pragmatics, 3, 49-56.

Source

Özer, D. G. & Şener, S. M. (2013). User accessibility optimization using genetic algorithm: aDA. A|Z ITU Journal of Faculty of Architecture,10(2), 212-230.

Source

Gi̇rgi̇nkaya, C., Güney, Gi̇rgi̇nkaya, S., Çağdaş, G., Yavuz, S.(2012) Tailoring a geomodel for analyzing an urban skyline. Journal of Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 105, No. 1, 160-173.

Source

Gül, L.F., Wang, X., Çağdaş, G. (2012) Evaluationg The Models Of Communication A Study Of Collaborative Design In Virtual Environments. Itcon, 17, 464-484.

Source

Keles, H. Y., Özkar, M. & Tari, S. (2012). Weighted Shapes for Embedding Perceived Wholes. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 39(2), 360–375.

Source

Özkar, M. (2011) Visual Schemas: Pragmatics of Design Learning in Foundations Studios. Nexus Network Journal 13, 113–130.

Source

Zaman, H., Özkar, M., Çağdaş, G. (2011) Towards Hands on Computing in Design An Analysis of the Haptic Dimension of Model Making. METU Journal of Faculty of Architecture, 28(2), 209-226.

Source

Torus, B., (2011). Learning from Vernacular Turkish House: Designing Mass-Customized Houses in Mardin, Intercultural Understanding, 1, 105-112.

Source

Evrenosoğlu C. Y., Abur A., Akleman E. & Özener O. Ö. (2009). Bewley Diagrams Revisited via Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 24(3), 1401-1407.

Source

Çağdaş, G. (2008) Yansımalar / Çağrışımlar / Keşifler, Batı Akdeniz Mimarlık, No. 40, 41-44, Mimarlar Odası Antalya Şubesi

Çağdaş, G.,Gözübüyük, G.,Ediz, Ö. (2008) M. Mimari Tasarımda Fraktal Kurguya Dayalı Form Üretimi. Kültür Üniversitesi, Bilim ve Mühendislik Dergisi, 4(2), 1-12.

Source

Edi̇z, Ö. M., Çağdaş, G. (2008) Kaos Fraktaller Ve Mimari Tasarım. Kültür Üniversitesi, Bilim Ve Mühendislik Dergisi, 4(3), 155-160.

Source

Çağdaş, G. (2008) Yansımalar Çağrışımlar Keşifler. Batı Akdeniz Mimarlık, No. 40, 41-44.

Ediz, Ö., Çağdaş, G. (2007) A Computational Architectural Design Model Based On Fractals. Openhouse International, 32(2), 36-45.

Source

Tong, H., Çağdaş, G., (2006) Global Bir Tasarım Stüdyosuna Doğru , STÜDYO: Tasarım, Kuram, Eleştiri Dergisi, Sayı 3, http://www.studyomim.itu.edu.tr

Source

Ediz, Ö., Çağdaş, G., Gözübüyük, G., (2006) Mimari Tasarımda Fraktal Kurguya Dayalı Form Üretimi, Kültür Üniversitesi, Bilim ve Mühendislik Dergisi, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1-12.

Source

Ediz, Ö., Çağdaş, G., (2006) Kaos, Fraktaller ve Mimari Tasarım, Kültür Üniversitesi, Bilim ve Mühendislik Dergisi, Vol. 4, No. 3, 155–160, (Uluslararası Katılımlı Kaos ve Karmaşık Sistemler Disiplinlerarası 1. Sempozyum’unda sunulmuştur.)

Source

Çağdaş, G., Kasapoğlu, B. (2006). Global Bir Tasarım Stüdyosuna Doğru. Stüdyo: Tasarım, Kuram, Eleştiri Dergisi, No.3.

Sökmenoğlu, A., Çağdaş, G. (2006)Transformations created by ICKT on the architectural design and its education. ITU J Faculty Arch. 3(1), 37-52.

Source

Pak B., Özener O. Ö., Erdem A. (2006). Utilizing customizable generative design tools in digital design studio: Xp-GEN experimental form generator. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 4(4), 21-33.

Source

Özener O. Ö., Akleman E., Srinivasan V. (2005). Interactive Rind Modeling for Architectural Design. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 3(1), 93-106.

Source

Erdem, A. & Pak, B. (2005). Information and Communication Technologies in Design Studio: New Tools, Strategies and Techniques at Work, A|Z ITU Journal of Faculty of Architecture,2(1), 52-61.

Source

Güzelci, O. Z., Bayram, A. K. Ş., Alaçam, S., Güzelci, H., Akkuyu, E. I., & Şencan, İ. (2021). Design tactics for enhancing the adaptability of primary and middle schools to the new needs of postpandemic reuse. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 15(1), 148-166.

Source

Akçay Kavakoğlu, A., Güleç Özer, D., Domingo-Callabuig, D. & Bilen, Ö.(2021). Architectural design communication (ADC) in online education during COVID-19 pandemic: a comparison of Turkish and Spanish universities. Open House International, 47(2), 361-384.

Source

Yıldız, B. & Çağdaş, G. (2021). Bulanık Mantık ile Kullanıcı Hareketlerinde Etmen Tabanlı Modelleme. JCoDe: Journal of Computational Design/Hesaplamalı Tasarım Dergisi, İTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi E-Dergisi, 2(1), 243-264.

Source

Alkılınç, E, Cenani, Ş.,& Çağdaş, G. (2021). Bisiklet Paylaşım İstasyonlarının Belirlenmesi: CBS Tabanlı Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yaklaşımı / Determination of bicycle sharing stations: GIS-based multi-criteria decision making approach. Journal of Balıkesir University Institute of Science and Technology, 23(2), 471-489.

Source

Karakoç, E. & Çağdaş, G. (2021). A Data-Driven Conceptual Framework for Climate Adaptive Building Shell: A Hybrid Control Strategy.Civil Engineering and Architecture, 9(2), 427-438.

Source

Karakoç, E. & Çağdaş, G. (2021). Adaptive Architecture Based on Environmental Performance: An Advanced Intelligent Façade (AIF) Module. Gazi University Journal of Science, 34(3), 630-650.

Source

Moralıoğlu, B., Cenani, Ş.,& Çağdaş, G. (2021). A Decision Support System for Placing Shared E-Scooters: A Case Study for İstanbul. Journal of Computational Design, 2(2), 127-148.

Source

Dinçer, A.E & Çağdaş, G. (2021). A Spatial Grammar Model for Designing Mass Customized High-rise Housing Blocks. Journal of Computational Design, 2(2), 51-72.

Source

Aksoy, E. S., Cenani, Ş., & Çağdaş, G. (2021). Kamusal Alanlar Arasındaki Mikromobiliteyi Destekleyecek Kişiselleştirilmiş Ulaşım Modeli Önerisi. İDEALKENT, 12(33), 1006-1037.

Source

Yazıcı, S. (2021). The Performance-based Interlinked Model (PBIM) in Architectural Design: Exchanging Environmental, Structural and Spatial Parameters in the Early Design Stage. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 38(1), 23-52.

Source

Sevinç, E., & Alaçam, S. (2021). Mimari nesneyi değerlendirmek için mereolojik bir çerçeve. Journal of Computational Design, 2(1), 1-26. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jcode/issue/60846/863148

Source

Çavuş, Ö. (2021). Phenomenological evaluation on wayfinding in complex educational buildings: The case of ITU Faculty of Architecture. Journal of Computational Design, 2(1), 285-312. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jcode/issue/60846/862422

Source